Did you know that nearly half of American adults are overweight or obese, with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or higher? Tracking body fat isn’t just for athletes anymore. It can help with weight management and recognize potential health risks for serious chronic conditions like diabetes and heart disease. Enter the world of body fat scales. In this article, we’ll explore how these scales work, their accuracy, and other methods to measure your fat mass percentage.
How do body fat scales work?
Body fat scales are a type of weighing scale that measures your total weight and estimates the percentage that comes from fat mass. They look similar to regular bathroom scales but come equipped with metal electrodes. When you step on these scales barefoot, these electrodes make contact with your feet.
Start seeing the full picture of your health with the Hume Body Pod, tracking data with 98% accuracy using advanced sensors.
The way body fat scales work is based on a principle called bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). BIA measures resistance (impedance) to the flow of a low-level electrical current as it travels through the body. Since fat and muscle conduct electricity differently, with fat having more resistance compared to muscle, these scales can estimate a person's body fat percentage based on this resistance.
The actual calculation of your body fat percentage is more complicated and greatly depends on both the device's accuracy and the data it collects from you. Typically, the scale may collect information such as your total body weight, muscle mass, bone density, gender, age, height, and body fat percentage.
How accurate are body fat scales?
In general, they can only provide a rough estimate. A 2021 observational study compared three commercially available body composition scales from different brands. During the tests, the researchers found that not only did the metric data, such as fat and muscle mass, differ between these devices, but they also found them off-track compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The error range in fat mass calculation was from -2.2 to .4 kg. DEXA is considered the gold standard for measuring body composition in hospitals and medical clinics. Based on the results, the researchers highlight that smart scales should not be used in clinical settings instead of DEXA.
A 2023 study examined 15 consumer BIA scales costing $24–349 and compared them to a high-end 4C laboratory model. This model was based on a combination of DEXA, air displacement plethysmography (ADP), and bioimpedance spectroscopy. The study found that while most smart scales were reliable, nearly half of the devices could not properly detect composition changes over time. The researchers noted significant differences between the BIA metrics and their 4C model — up to 11.7%.
Many people use traditional scales to measure their total weight and a body mass index (BMI) calculator that tells whether they fall between the categories of underweight, overweight, or obese based on their height, age, and weight. However, BMI cannot estimate body fat percentage or accurately track the necessary metrics to assess body composition. Several studies found that BMI may be less effective in some instances compared to BIA and variations of BIA, such as bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) and hand-to-foot BIA in assessing health status in terms of body composition.
As such, while BIA, the popular technology behind smart scales, may potentially be less accurate than technologies used in clinical settings, it is still an appropriate way of keeping up-to-date with individual body metrics at home, especially when used properly.
Factors affecting accuracy
Several factors can affect body composition scales. These include:
Metrics
The more accurate metrics that a body scale can capture, the better the result. When including measurements such as height and skin fold thickness, these scales can provide a much more accurate indication of how much fat a person has. However, smart scales do not have the capability of assessing skin fold thickness.
Hydration levels
A 2020 study among 140 participants using digital body fat scales found that the more water the participants drank, the greater the overestimation of fat mass the scales reported. In the study, the participants drank 500 ml water at baseline and then four times more, each 15 minutes before measuring themselves.
Surprisingly, such scales also underestimated the total water percentage and lean muscle mass by the end of the study. The smart scales overestimated the fat percentage by up to 9.4% after 2,000 ml of water intake, underestimated the water percentage by up to 35%, and muscle mass by up to 50%.
Food and drink consumption
Eating or drinking for up to 4 hours before measuring yourself may lead to errors in measurements. The researchers recommend that you avoid eating before using your scale. If not possible, consider measuring yourself in the morning before you eat or drink anything after a good night's sleep.
Physical activity
Heavy exercise can temporarily increase blood flow, muscle contraction, and body temperature, potentially affecting overall results. Keeping your exercise and measurement sessions consistent can be difficult, so being fully rested before using a smart scale may lead to more accurate data over the long term.
Gender and age
People born males typically have lower fat mass and higher muscle mass than those born female. As we grow older, we also tend to gain fat while losing muscle, water, and bone mass.
Women going through menopause tend to have body tissue shifts, which may alter their body composition proportions. Smart scales without different equations based on gender, age, and evolving body changes may be less accurate.
Ethnicity
Different races and ethnic groups tend to have varying body structures. These may lead to variations in fat mass calculations, often resulting in errors when using scales that don’t cater to ethnic differences.
Skin temperature
A 2019 study focused on hydration level measurements found that taking a 10-minute cold shower after running exercise may help lower the body temperature. This may potentially lead to more accurate hydration measurements when using a smart scale. However, note that such scientific evidence is limited.
Placement
For best results, place the scales on a flat surface. Depending on the model of the scales, you may need to keep them away from metallic objects.
Medical conditions
People with unique physical conditions may not be able to get an accurate reading from an at-home smart scale. This is because of the different physiques due to their condition.
Posture
The angle and shape of your posture can influence the results. A review reports a study where researchers used BIA to measure water weight in different body sections.
They found that when people lie down compared to standing up, the water content in their arms and legs decreases, while the water content in the central part of the body increases.
Electrodes
Smart scales with BIA use electrodes to send and receive electrical signals. The number, placement, size, sensitivity, and distance of the electrodes may result in significant differences in accuracy.
Overall, the smart scales that measure body composition most effectively with the BIA model use accurate calculation formulas to cater to the above scenarios. Some smart scales may not cater to all individual needs, leading to higher error rates and incorrect results, thus it is important to choose the ones most suitable for specific situations.
Pros and cons of body fat scales
Here are the advantages and disadvantages of body fat scales.
How to use body fat scales correctly
Here’s how you can get the more accurate readings:
- Drink water consistently, but avoid eating or drinking large amounts immediately before taking a measurement.
- Try to measure yourself at the same time of day each time. Morning, after waking up, is often recommended due to potentially more consistent results after a night's sleep.
- Use the bathroom before stepping on the scale to ensure you’re measuring yourself under the same circumstances.
- Ensure your feet are clean and dry, and make contact with the metal electrodes on the scale. Avoid wearing socks or footwear in case they block the electrical signal necessary for the analysis.
- If your scale needs calibration, follow the manufacturer’s instructions.
- Stand still; during the measurement, avoid moving and maintain a consistent, upright posture to ensure the most accurate readings.
- Use the same clothing in a consistent room temperature and humidity.
- Keeping a log of your measurements over time can help identify trends more reliably than focusing on single measurements, considering day-to-day fluctuations are normal.
- Recognize that body fat scales provide an estimate, not exact measurements.
- If your scale allows for user profiles, ensure you’re using the same profile for each measurement to maintain consistency. Always use the same scale.
- Use a scale that is third-party tested and collects as many metrics as possible.
Other methods to measure body fat percentage
Here are some other ways to measure body fat percentage.
- Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). DEXA is a highly accurate method that can differentiate between bone, fat, and muscle mass in various body parts. It uses low-dose X-rays to estimate body composition. This method is considered a gold standard for measuring body composition.
- Hydrostatic weighing. Hydrostatic weighing, also known as underwater weighing, measures a person's body density by comparing their weight on land to their weight submerged in water. Underwater weighing can be uncomfortable because it may require exhaling air before going underwater.
- Air displacement plethysmography (ADP). ADP uses air displacement to measure body volume and, subsequently, body density. Then, it can measure fat and fat-free mass. It's a quick, non-invasive method and has been shown to have comparable results to DEXA and hydrostatic weighing for body fat measurement.
- Skinfold measurements. Skinfold thickness measurements use calipers to measure the thickness of skinfolds at specific body sites. These measurements are then used in formulas to estimate body density and fat percentage. While less accurate than methods like DEXA, skinfold measurements are inexpensive. However, skinfold thickness is one type of measurement, making them useful alongside smart scales, but not an actual replacement.
Final word
Body fat scales are popular for measuring body composition at home. They use BIA technology, which collects metrics based on low-level electrical signals that move through the body. While cost-effective and easy to use, such scales can only provide a rough estimate.
If you have any medical conditions that require properly tracking your fat-free mass, bone density, fat percentage, or any other metrics it is best to speak with your doctor about at-clinic options, such as DEXA or the Bod Pod. These can provide a more accurate assessment that may tell you more specific body characteristics.
Do you have any questions or want to share your experience with body fat scales? Share them below in the comments section.
FAQ
What time of day is best for using body fat scales?
The most consistent time to use body fat scales is in the morning, right after waking up. This minimizes variable factors like hydration that can occur throughout the day, affecting measurement accuracy. Emptying your bladder before using your scale also helps with consistency.
How often should I use a body fat scale?
It is better to avoid using your scale multiple times a day. This is because the dynamic environmental and body changes, such as food intake, may make the measurements less accurate. Consider using it about once to a few times a week. This allows you to observe trends without being affected by the day-to-day variations.
What is the flaw in using scales to find your body fat?
Scale accuracy depends on many factors, including the metrics it collects, the formulas it uses, and the environment. They are also not suitable for health conditions such as amputations.
-
Body fat scales provide an easy, affordable way to track fat percentage at home.
-
Depending on their specifications, they may be less accurate compared to other methods, such as DEXA or Bod Pod.
-
While tracking yourself can be helpful and motivating for weight loss, overdoing it may lead to inconsistent results or focusing on a single metric instead of overall health.
-
For more accurate readings, measure yourself under consistent conditions, such as the timing of the day.
-
Remember that exercising regularly and eating well can help with excess fat loss. When in doubt, talk with your doctor.
23 resources
- CDC. Adult obesity facts.
- Sensors (Basel). The theory and fundamentals of bioimpedance analysis in clinical status monitoring and diagnosis of diseases.
- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Accuracy of smart scales on weight and body composition: observational study.
- Journal of Personalized Medicine. Withings body cardio versus gold standards of pulse-wave velocity and body composition.
- Plos One. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in obese and overweight children.
- Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Validation of hf-bioelectrical impedance analysis versus body mass index in classifying overweight and obese Pakistani adults.
- Libyan Journal of Medicine. Evaluating of altered hydration status on effectiveness of body composition analysis using bioelectric impedance analysis.
- BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. Effect of position and exercise on measurement of muscle quantity and quality: towards a standardised pragmatic protocol for clinical practice.
- Nutrients. Impedance analysis to evaluate nutritional status in physiological and pathological conditions.
- International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. Stabilizing bioimpedance-vector-analysis measures with a 10-minute cold shower after running exercise to enable assessment of body hydration.
- Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. Safety and results of bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
- PeerJ. Development and validation of bioimpedance prediction equations for fat-free mass in unilateral male amputees.
- Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance. Validation of non-empirical fat-free mass estimation model for a wrist-worn device.
- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Accuracy of smart scales on weight and body composition: observational study.
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation.
- Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. Visceral adipose tissue and residual cardiovascular risk: a pathological link and new therapeutic options.
- Obesity (Silver Spring). Accuracy of self-report versus objective smart scale weights during a 12-week weight management intervention.
- International Journal of Exercise Science. Effects of heat exposure on body water assessed using single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and bioimpedance spectroscopy.
- StatPearls Publishing. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
- Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. A more comfortable method for hydrostatic weighing: head above water at total lung capacity.
- Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. Effects of acute and 2-hour postphysical activity on the estimation of body fat made by the bod pod.
- Archives of Public Health. Body fat percentage assessment by skinfold equation, bioimpedance and densitometry in older adults.
- The British Journal of Nutrition. Assessing the reliability and cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of fifteen bioelectrical impedance analysis devices.
Your email will not be published. All fields are required.